Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PBCJX vs RGACX
PBCJX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PBCJX vs RGACX
PBCJX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PBCJX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBCJX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PBCJX (6.6B). PBCJX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . PBCJX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PBCJX (9 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than PBCJX (0.78). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PBCJX (20.90). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBCJX: RGACX (250) vs PBCJX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. PBCJX (-20.24). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. PBCJX (-5.29).
| PBCJX | RGACX | PBCJX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.93 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.239 | 8.819 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.6B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.24 | -0.53 | 3,810% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.01 | 40.68 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.29 | 10.82 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement