PBFS
Price
$17.36
Change
+$0.24 (+1.40%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
419.88M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBSI
Price
$32.07
Change
+$0.10 (+0.31%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
955.94M
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBFS vs SBSI

PBFS vs SBSI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBFS vs. SBSI commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBFS is a Hold and SBSI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (PBFS: $17.36 vs. SBSI: $32.07)
Brand notoriety: PBFS and SBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBFS: 51% vs. SBSI: 77%
Market capitalization -- PBFS: $419.88M vs. SBSI: $955.94M
PBFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $419.88M. SBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $955.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBSI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PBFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBSI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBFS is a better buy in the long-term than SBSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBSI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBSI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBFS is a better buy in the short-term than SBSI.

Price Growth

PBFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while SBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBSI is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBSI($956M) has a higher market cap than PBFS($420M). PBFS has higher P/E ratio than SBSI: PBFS (24.79) vs SBSI (12.58). PBFS YTD gains are higher at: 28.820 vs. SBSI (9.162). SBSI has higher revenues than PBFS: SBSI (248M) vs PBFS (98.1M).
PBFSSBSIPBFS / SBSI
Capitalization420M956M44%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.8209.162315%
P/E Ratio24.7912.58197%
Revenue98.1M248M40%
Total CashN/A74.7M-
Total DebtN/A1.64B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBFS vs SBSI: Fundamental Ratings
PBFS
SBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5076
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4681
SMR RATING
1..100
7456
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2128
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBSI's Valuation (17) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBFS (86) in the null industry. This means that SBSI’s stock grew significantly faster than PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBSI (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBSI’s over the last 12 months.

SBSI's SMR Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PBFS (74) in the null industry. This means that SBSI’s stock grew similarly to PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SBSI (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to SBSI’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as SBSI (28) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to SBSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBFSSBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGERX14.050.11
+0.79%
JHancock Global Equity R2
RUSTX18.850.11
+0.59%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity M
JGVVX45.270.20
+0.44%
JPMorgan Growth Advantage R6
ASGTX4.930.01
+0.20%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth A
PHRCX21.03-0.04
-0.19%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs C

PBFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBFS has been loosely correlated with ALRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBFS jumps, then ALRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBFS
1D Price
Change %
PBFS100%
+1.43%
ALRS - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
SBSI - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
FRBA - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
MBWM - PBFS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
FDBC - PBFS
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
More