PBFS
Price
$17.22
Change
-$0.41 (-2.33%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
431.82M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBSI
Price
$33.07
Change
+$0.56 (+1.72%)
Updated
Aug 3, 10:42 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
967.23M
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBFS vs SBSI

PBFS vs SBSI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBFS vs. SBSI commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBFS is a Buy and SBSI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (PBFS: $17.22 vs. SBSI: $32.51)
Brand notoriety: PBFS and SBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBFS: 49% vs. SBSI: 91%
Market capitalization -- PBFS: $431.82M vs. SBSI: $967.23M
PBFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $431.82M. SBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $967.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBSI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PBFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBSI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBFS is a better buy in the long-term than SBSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBSI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBSI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBFS is a better buy in the short-term than SBSI.

Price Growth

PBFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.93% price change this week, while SBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBSI is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBSI($967M) has a higher market cap than PBFS($432M). PBFS has higher P/E ratio than SBSI: PBFS (24.60) vs SBSI (12.75). PBFS YTD gains are higher at: 27.745 vs. SBSI (9.392). SBSI has higher revenues than PBFS: SBSI (248M) vs PBFS (98.1M).
PBFSSBSIPBFS / SBSI
Capitalization432M967M45%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.7459.392295%
P/E Ratio24.6012.75193%
Revenue98.1M248M40%
Total CashN/A73M-
Total DebtN/A1.64B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBFS vs SBSI: Fundamental Ratings
PBFS
SBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5074
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4889
SMR RATING
1..100
7756
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2030
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBSI's Valuation (17) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBFS (85) in the null industry. This means that SBSI’s stock grew significantly faster than PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBSI (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBSI’s over the last 12 months.

SBSI's SMR Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PBFS (77) in the null industry. This means that SBSI’s stock grew similarly to PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SBSI (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to SBSI’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SBSI (30) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to SBSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBFSSBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KSCOX189.932.48
+1.32%
Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities No Load
IYITX24.300.18
+0.75%
Nomura International Core Equity R
VVIPX17.370.12
+0.70%
Voya VACS Index S
VCAAX12.100.04
+0.33%
VALIC Company I Asset Allocation
RIREX83.920.07
+0.08%
American Funds Capital Inc Bldr R-4

PBFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBFS has been loosely correlated with FRBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBFS jumps, then FRBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBFS
1D Price
Change %
PBFS100%
-2.33%
FRBA - PBFS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
MBWM - PBFS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
ALRS - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
SBSI - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
FVCB - PBFS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
More