Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCEMX vs RNWHX
PCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts PCEMX vs RNWHX
PCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. PCEMX (581M). PCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: PCEMX (1.53) vs RNWHX (1.15). PCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: PCEMX (31 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). PCEMX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). PCEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs PCEMX (10000). PCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.21 vs. RNWHX (17.19). PCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 34.33 vs. RNWHX (17.68).
| PCEMX | RNWHX | PCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.72 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.310 | 16.447 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 581M | 90B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.15 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.21 | 17.19 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.91 | 53.84 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.33 | 17.68 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.54 | 111.44 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers