Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCEMX vs RNWHX
PCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts PCEMX vs RNWHX
PCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. PCEMX (572M). PCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: PCEMX (1.57) vs RNWHX (1.17). PCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: PCEMX (31 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). PCEMX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). PCEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs PCEMX (10000). PCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.13 vs. RNWHX (21.78). PCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 34.84 vs. RNWHX (17.87).
| PCEMX | RNWHX | PCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.72 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.993 | 13.978 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 572M | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.17 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.13 | 21.78 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.29 | 44.40 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.84 | 17.87 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.06 | 107.97 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement