Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGABX
PCLCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGABX
PCLCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PCLCX (708M). PCLCX pays higher dividends than RGABX: PCLCX (0.01) vs RGABX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: PCLCX (31 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than PCLCX (0.91). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGABX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.39 vs. PCLCX (-7.17). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 7.60 vs. PCLCX (-43.01).
| PCLCX | RGABX | PCLCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.38 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.38 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.102 | 5.948 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.17 | 6.39 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.72 | 38.15 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.01 | 7.60 | -566% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.80 | 92.74 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement