Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGACX
PCLCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGACX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$20.04
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets790.42M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.84
Change-$0.41 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
PCLCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PCLCX (790M). RGACX pays higher dividends than PCLCX: RGACX (0.07) vs PCLCX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and PCLCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGACX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.17 vs. PCLCX (5.63). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.01 vs. PCLCX (-27.89).
| PCLCX | RGACX | PCLCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.94 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.062 | 17.850 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 790M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 16.17 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.68 | 60.87 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.89 | 46.01 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.82 | 99.93 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement