Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGACX
PCLCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGACX
PCLCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PCLCX (666M). PCLCX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PCLCX (0.01) vs RGACX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PCLCX (31 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) and PCLCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGACX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. PCLCX (-17.34). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 9.61 vs. PCLCX (-47.96).
| PCLCX | RGACX | PCLCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.93 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.93 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.243 | 8.108 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.34 | -1.02 | 1,706% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.21 | 40.74 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.96 | 9.61 | -499% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.70 | 98.20 | -27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers