Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGAGX
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGAGX
PCLCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PCLCX (708M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PCLCX: RGAGX (0.51) vs PCLCX (0.01). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PCLCX (31 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). PCLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGAGX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. PCLCX (-7.17). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.49 vs. PCLCX (-43.01).
| PCLCX | RGAGX | PCLCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.29 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.29 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.102 | 6.516 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.51 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.17 | 9.05 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.72 | 47.07 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.01 | 17.49 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.80 | 117.26 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement