Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLVX vs RMEBX
PCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLVX vs RMEBX
PCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. PCLVX (783M). PCLVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PCLVX (1.21) vs RMEBX (1.04). PCLVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCLVX (31 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PCLVX (0.89). PCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLVX: RMEBX (250) vs PCLVX (10000). RMEBX (10.26) and PCLVX (10.26) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. PCLVX (3.29).
| PCLVX | RMEBX | PCLVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.486 | 6.614 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 783M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.04 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.26 | 10.26 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.63 | 29.20 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.29 | 37.34 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.59 | 91.84 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers