Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLVX vs RMFCX
PCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PCLVX vs RMFCX
PCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PCLVX (799M). PCLVX (1.21) and RMFCX (1.16) have matching dividends . PCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PCLVX (31 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) and PCLVX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs PCLVX (10000). PCLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. PCLVX (3.32).
| PCLVX | RMFCX | PCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.430 | 9.137 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 799M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.16 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 8.88 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 34.84 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.32 | 37.23 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.73 | 91.06 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement