Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCMFX vs SWCAX
PCMFX vs SWCAX Comparison
Open Charts PCMFX vs SWCAX
PCMFX vs SWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCMFX vs. SWCAX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCMFX is a Hold and SWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCMFX has more cash in the bank: 675M vs. SWCAX (605M). PCMFX pays higher dividends than SWCAX: PCMFX (3.81) vs SWCAX (3.25). PCMFX was incepted earlier than SWCAX: PCMFX (12 years) vs SWCAX (35 years). PCMFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than SWCAX (0.41). PCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.20 vs. SWCAX (35.00). PCMFX (0) and SWCAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.93 vs. SWCAX (3.91). SWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.12 vs. PCMFX (-1.44).
| PCMFX | SWCAX | PCMFX / SWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.38 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.41 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.648 | -0.074 | -881% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 675M | 605M | 112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 3.25 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 3.91 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.51 | 10.09 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.44 | 2.12 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.80 | 11.07 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers