Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCMFX vs SWCAX
PCMFX vs SWCAX Comparison
Open Charts PCMFX vs SWCAX
PCMFX vs SWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCMFX vs. SWCAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCMFX is a Hold and SWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCMFX has more cash in the bank: 683M vs. SWCAX (601M). PCMFX pays higher dividends than SWCAX: PCMFX (3.73) vs SWCAX (3.19). PCMFX was incepted earlier than SWCAX: PCMFX (11 years) vs SWCAX (34 years). PCMFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than SWCAX (0.41). PCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.20 vs. SWCAX (35.00). PCMFX (0) and SWCAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. SWCAX (5.74). SWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.53 vs. PCMFX (0.04).
| PCMFX | SWCAX | PCMFX / SWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.38 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.41 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.646 | 0.951 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 683M | 601M | 114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 3.19 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 5.74 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.92 | 10.51 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.04 | 3.53 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.63 | 12.79 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement