Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCODX vs RWMFX
PCODX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts PCODX vs RWMFX
PCODX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCODX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCODX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. PCODX (11.4B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than PCODX: RWMFX (1.40) vs PCODX (0.00). PCODX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: PCODX (30 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). PCODX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). PCODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCODX: RWMFX (250) vs PCODX (2500). PCODX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.72 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. PCODX (8.36).
| PCODX | RWMFX | PCODX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.31 | 555% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.31 | 568% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.318 | 5.575 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 214B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.72 | 8.10 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.78 | 33.11 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.36 | 26.71 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.58 | 85.42 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement