Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMEBX
PCPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. PCPAX (783M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PCPAX: RMEBX (1.04) vs PCPAX (0.98). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PCPAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). PCPAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMEBX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). PCPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. PCPAX (0.69).
| PCPAX | RMEBX | PCPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.07 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.07 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.365 | 6.308 | 148% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 783M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.04 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.02 | 9.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.51 | 34.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.69 | 34.74 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.09 | 94.33 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement