Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMFCX
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMFCX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$23.43
Change+$0.27 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets766.03M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PCPAX (766M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PCPAX (1.32) vs RMFCX (1.20). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMFCX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. PCPAX (3.37). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.04 vs. PCPAX (33.20).
| PCPAX | RMFCX | PCPAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.089 | 14.613 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 766M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.20 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.37 | 5.54 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 39.44 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.20 | 61.04 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.49 | 88.77 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement