Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMFCX
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMFCX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$22.92
Change-$0.06 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets770.03M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PCPAX (770M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PCPAX (1.33) vs RMFCX (1.24). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMFCX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. PCPAX (6.51). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. PCPAX (32.61).
| PCPAX | RMFCX | PCPAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.906 | 11.421 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 770M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 7.71 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.71 | 32.16 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.61 | 56.41 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.34 | 91.12 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement