Ad is loading...
PCPAX vs RMFCX
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMFCX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$20.53
Change-$0.83 (-3.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.61M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.14
Change-$1.81 (-3.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. PCPAX (762M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PCPAX (1.43) vs RMFCX (1.34). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PCPAX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMFCX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. PCPAX (3.68). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.10 vs. PCPAX (59.89).
| PCPAX | RMFCX | PCPAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.222 | 2.814 | 186% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 762M | 103B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.34 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | 6.77 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.10 | 11.46 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.89 | 76.10 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.19 | 64.62 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers