Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMFCX
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMFCX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$23.15
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets770.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PCPAX (771M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PCPAX (1.33) vs RMFCX (1.24). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMFCX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. PCPAX (4.94). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. PCPAX (40.26).
| PCPAX | RMFCX | PCPAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.039 | 13.245 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 771M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | 6.41 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.86 | 42.10 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.26 | 63.20 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.10 | 103.62 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement