Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMFCX
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMFCX
PACE Large Co Value Equity A
Price$23.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets756.2M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. PCPAX (756M). PCPAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PCPAX (1.32) vs RMFCX (1.21). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PCPAX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMFCX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. PCPAX (2.07). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.85 vs. PCPAX (22.51).
| PCPAX | RMFCX | PCPAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.941 | 12.617 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 756M | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.21 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.07 | 5.59 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.97 | 27.75 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.51 | 51.85 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.14 | 84.46 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement