Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMFCX
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMFCX
PCPAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PCPAX (799M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PCPAX: RMFCX (1.16) vs PCPAX (0.98). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PCPAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). PCPAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMFCX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). PCPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. PCPAX (2.40).
| PCPAX | RMFCX | PCPAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.286 | 9.137 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 799M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.16 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.47 | 8.88 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.88 | 34.84 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.40 | 37.23 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.11 | 91.06 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement