Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCPAX vs RMFEX
PCPAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PCPAX vs RMFEX
PCPAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCPAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCPAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PCPAX (799M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PCPAX: RMFEX (1.42) vs PCPAX (0.98). PCPAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PCPAX (26 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). PCPAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). PCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCPAX: RMFEX (250) vs PCPAX (1000). PCPAX (9.47) and RMFEX (9.23) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. PCPAX (2.40).
| PCPAX | RMFEX | PCPAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.62 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.62 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.286 | 9.303 | 132% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 799M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.42 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.47 | 9.23 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.88 | 36.13 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.40 | 39.39 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.11 | 99.14 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement