Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDEAX vs RNWBX
PDEAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PDEAX vs RNWBX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps A
Price$18.43
Change-$0.16 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets627.26M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.39B
PDEAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDEAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDEAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.4B vs. PDEAX (627M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than PDEAX: RNWBX (0.13) vs PDEAX (0.00). PDEAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PDEAX (11 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PDEAX (1.53). PDEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDEAX: RNWBX (250) vs PDEAX (1000). PDEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. RNWBX (8.81). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.94 vs. PDEAX (16.19).
| PDEAX | RNWBX | PDEAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.67 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.968 | 15.649 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 70.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | 8.81 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.60 | 38.06 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.19 | 23.94 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.45 | 61.55 | 149% |