Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PDEAX vs RNWBX
PDEAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PDEAX vs RNWBX
PDEAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PDEAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PDEAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. PDEAX (1.09B). PDEAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PDEAX (1.54) vs RNWBX (0.41). PDEAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PDEAX (12 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PDEAX (1.52). PDEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDEAX: RNWBX (250) vs PDEAX (1000). PDEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.46 vs. RNWBX (29.69). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.20 vs. PDEAX (8.39).
| PDEAX | RNWBX | PDEAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.66 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.66 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.150 | 18.201 | 199% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.41 | 373% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.46 | 29.69 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.57 | 52.51 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.39 | 15.20 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 217.41 | 122.04 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers