PEGR
Price
$9.73
Change
-$1.08 (-9.99%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
192.74M
SLAMF
Price
$11.43
Change
+$0.03 (+0.26%)
Updated
Jan 27 closing price
Capitalization
438.8M
Ad is loading...

PEGR vs SLAMF

Header iconPEGR vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts PEGR vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Project Energy Reimagined Acquisition
Price$9.73
Change-$1.08 (-9.99%)
Volume$14.36K
Capitalization192.74M
Slam
Price$11.43
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
Volume$200
Capitalization438.8M
PEGR vs SLAMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PEGR vs. SLAMF commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEGR is a StrongBuy and SLAMF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (PEGR: $9.73 vs. SLAMF: $11.43)
Brand notoriety: PEGR and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PEGR: 100% vs. SLAMF: 1%
Market capitalization -- PEGR: $192.74M vs. SLAMF: $438.8M
PEGR [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $192.74M. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $438.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PEGR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PEGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLAMF is a better buy in the long-term than PEGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLAMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

PEGR (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

PEGR is expected to report earnings on Apr 07, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($439M) has a higher market cap than PEGR($193M). SLAMF (65.00) and PEGR (63.11) have similar P/E ratio . SLAMF YTD gains are higher at: 0.705 vs. PEGR (0.000). PEGR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.58M vs. SLAMF (-3.36M). PEGR has more cash in the bank: 89.5K vs. SLAMF (3.34K). PEGR has less debt than SLAMF: PEGR (272K) vs SLAMF (10.2M). PEGR (0) and SLAMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PEGRSLAMFPEGR / SLAMF
Capitalization193M439M44%
EBITDA-2.58M-3.36M77%
Gain YTD0.0000.705-
P/E Ratio63.1165.0097%
Revenue00-
Total Cash89.5K3.34K2,681%
Total Debt272K10.2M3%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PEGRSLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
3%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
41%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
W50.101.61
+3.32%
Wayfair
PYPL89.570.81
+0.91%
PayPal Holdings
SGML10.850.09
+0.84%
Sigma Lithium Corp
LGTY14.13N/A
N/A
Logility Supply Chain Solutions Inc
CNTB0.97N/A
N/A
Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited

PEGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PEGR and ASCBF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PEGR and ASCBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEGR
1D Price
Change %
PEGR100%
N/A
ASCBF - PEGR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLAMF - PEGR
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RFAC - PEGR
25%
Poorly correlated
-17.24%
RENE - PEGR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEEP - PEGR
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.40%
More

SLAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with RCFAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then RCFAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAMF
1D Price
Change %
SLAMF100%
N/A
RCFAF - SLAMF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LGYV - SLAMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFSCF - SLAMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEGR - SLAMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBOE - SLAMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More