Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs PKSCX
PEMGX vs PKSCX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs PKSCX
PEMGX vs PKSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. PKSCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Buy and PKSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. PKSCX (1.75B). PEMGX (0.00) and PKSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than PKSCX: PEMGX (21 years) vs PKSCX (24 years). PKSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. PKSCX (13.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PKSCX: PEMGX (1000) vs PKSCX (2500). PEMGX (-14.48) and PKSCX (-15.17) have marching annual gain over last year. PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -5.82 vs. PKSCX (-19.13).
| PEMGX | PKSCX | PEMGX / PKSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.99 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.99 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.591 | 6.563 | -70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 1.75B | 1,324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.48 | -15.17 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.28 | -8.00 | -141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.82 | -19.13 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.25 | 70.16 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers