Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs PKSCX
PEMGX vs PKSCX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs PKSCX
PEMGX vs PKSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. PKSCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Buy and PKSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. PKSCX (1.77B). PEMGX (0.00) and PKSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than PKSCX: PEMGX (21 years) vs PKSCX (24 years). PKSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. PKSCX (13.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PKSCX: PEMGX (1000) vs PKSCX (2500). PKSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.29 vs. PEMGX (-14.32). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -4.63 vs. PKSCX (-18.16).
| PEMGX | PKSCX | PEMGX / PKSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.99 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.99 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.022 | 5.621 | -125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 1.77B | 1,336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.32 | -13.29 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.11 | -1.28 | -1,027% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.63 | -18.16 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.65 | 73.02 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers