Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs RSDGX
PEMGX vs RSDGX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs RSDGX
PEMGX vs RSDGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. RSDGX commentary
Aug 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Buy and RSDGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. RSDGX (83.8M). PEMGX (0.00) and RSDGX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than RSDGX: PEMGX (21 years) vs RSDGX (30 years). RSDGX (1.53) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). RSDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). RSDGX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSDGX: PEMGX (1000) vs RSDGX (2500). RSDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.41 vs. PEMGX (-13.67). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -5.27 vs. RSDGX (-41.24).
| PEMGX | RSDGX | PEMGX / RSDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.40 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.53 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.922 | 13.854 | -21% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 83.8M | 28,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.67 | 10.41 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.78 | 39.39 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.27 | -41.24 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.49 | -46.54 | -166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement