Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs RSDGX
PEMGX vs RSDGX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs RSDGX
PEMGX vs RSDGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. RSDGX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Hold and RSDGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 21B vs. RSDGX (80.7M). PEMGX (0.00) and RSDGX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than RSDGX: PEMGX (21 years) vs RSDGX (30 years). RSDGX (1.53) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). RSDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). RSDGX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSDGX: PEMGX (1000) vs RSDGX (2500). RSDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.13 vs. PEMGX (-19.08). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -9.69 vs. RSDGX (-42.22).
| PEMGX | RSDGX | PEMGX / RSDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.40 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.53 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.207 | 12.180 | -76% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21B | 80.7M | 26,022% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.08 | 1.13 | -1,686% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.03 | 40.45 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.69 | -42.22 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.48 | -46.26 | -148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers