Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs RSGFX
PEMGX vs RSGFX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs RSGFX
PEMGX vs RSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. RSGFX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Hold and RSGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. RSGFX (86.4M). PEMGX (0.00) and RSGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than RSGFX: PEMGX (21 years) vs RSGFX (19 years). RSGFX (4.31) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). RSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGFX: PEMGX (1000) vs RSGFX (2500). RSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.21 vs. PEMGX (-11.65). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.06 vs. RSGFX (-61.48).
| PEMGX | RSGFX | PEMGX / RSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.18 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 4.31 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.841 | 17.073 | -11% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 86.4M | 26,736% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.65 | -2.21 | 528% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.56 | 26.73 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.06 | -61.48 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.06 | -72.18 | -110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement