Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs RSMOX
PEMGX vs RSMOX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs RSMOX
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth A
Price$24.57
Change+$0.60 (+2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.76M
PEMGX vs RSMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. RSMOX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Buy and RSMOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. RSMOX (71.8M). PEMGX (0.00) and RSMOX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than RSMOX: PEMGX (20 years) vs RSMOX (30 years). RSMOX (1.45) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). RSMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 126.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). RSMOX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSMOX: PEMGX (1000) vs RSMOX (2500). RSMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.66 vs. PEMGX (-1.67). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.65 vs. RSMOX (-22.80).
| PEMGX | RSMOX | PEMGX / RSMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.20 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.45 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.323 | 5.641 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.5B | 71.8M | 45,265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | 13.66 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.36 | 53.07 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.65 | -22.80 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.68 | 18.72 | 532% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement