Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs RSMOX
PEMGX vs RSMOX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs RSMOX
PEMGX vs RSMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. RSMOX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Buy and RSMOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. RSMOX (70.9M). PEMGX (0.00) and RSMOX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than RSMOX: PEMGX (21 years) vs RSMOX (31 years). RSMOX (1.44) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). RSMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). RSMOX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSMOX: PEMGX (1000) vs RSMOX (2500). RSMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.12 vs. PEMGX (-15.06). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -4.45 vs. RSMOX (-20.03).
| PEMGX | RSMOX | PEMGX / RSMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.20 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.44 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.113 | 11.945 | -51% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 70.9M | 33,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.06 | 13.12 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.23 | 50.53 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.45 | -20.03 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.18 | 30.39 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers