Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs SMFAX
PEMGX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs SMFAX
PEMGX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. SMFAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. SMFAX (774M). PEMGX (0.00) and SMFAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: PEMGX (21 years) vs SMFAX (15 years). SMFAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). SMFAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFAX: PEMGX (1000) vs SMFAX (2500). PEMGX (-19.11) and SMFAX (-19.77) have marching annual gain over last year. PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. SMFAX (-19.56).
| PEMGX | SMFAX | PEMGX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.20 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.38 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.102 | 8.890 | -91% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3B | 774M | 2,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.11 | -19.77 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.32 | 8.38 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.00 | -19.56 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.78 | 68.66 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers