Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PEMGX vs WFDAX
PEMGX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts PEMGX vs WFDAX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$26.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets892.33M
PEMGX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PEMGX vs. WFDAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PEMGX is a Hold and WFDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. WFDAX (892M). PEMGX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PEMGX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: PEMGX (20 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). WFDAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). WFDAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX (1000) and WFDAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.45 vs. WFDAX (-10.07). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 25.57 vs. WFDAX (-41.52).
| PEMGX | WFDAX | PEMGX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.21 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.680 | 2.298 | -30% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.8B | 892M | 3,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.45 | -10.07 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.28 | 25.33 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.57 | -41.52 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.67 | -16.44 | -545% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement