PFF
Price
$30.00
Change
-$0.13 (-0.43%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
12.62B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFFA
Price
$20.69
Change
+$0.03 (+0.15%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
2.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFF vs PFFA

PFF vs PFFA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 31, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) vs. Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA)

Key Takeaways

  • PFF is a passive ETF tracking the ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, offering broad exposure to U.S. dollar-denominated preferred and hybrid securities with approximately 450 holdings.
  • PFFA is an actively managed ETF focused on U.S. preferred securities, employing strategies to manage call risk and optimize yield-to-call, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio.
  • Both ETFs target preferred securities for income generation, but PFF provides lower-cost passive diversification while PFFA uses active management that incurs higher expense ratios.
  • Sector exposure for both centers on financial institutions, with PFF showing additional allocation to industrials and utilities.
  • Structural differences include PFF’s index-tracking methodology versus PFFA’s active approach, influencing risk profiles, liquidity, and rebalancing dynamics in preferred securities markets.
  • In the current environment of interest rate sensitivity and income-seeking flows, PFF’s lower costs and broader diversification may appeal for core holdings, while PFFA’s active tilt targets enhanced yield potential.

Introduction

Preferred securities ETFs have gained relevance amid persistent demand for income-generating assets in a fluctuating interest rate environment. The iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) both provide exposure to U.S. preferred stocks but employ distinct strategies. PFF offers passive, rules-based access to a broad index of preferred and hybrid securities, while PFFA utilizes active management to navigate call risks and enhance income. These ETFs serve as alternatives within the preferred securities sector, appealing to investors seeking monthly distributions with varying degrees of diversification and cost efficiency.

iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) Overview

The iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) seeks to track the performance of the ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. This passive strategy provides exposure to exchange-listed, U.S. dollar-denominated preferred securities, hybrid securities, and convertible preferred securities meeting specific liquidity and size criteria. The fund typically holds around 450 securities, promoting broad diversification. Top holdings often include issuers from financial institutions such as Wells Fargo and Bank of America, alongside select industrials and utilities. Sector allocation is dominated by financial institutions (over 50%), with meaningful exposure to industrials and utilities. PFF maintains a competitive expense ratio of 0.45% and follows a monthly rebalancing process aligned with its underlying index methodology. As a large, liquid ETF listed on NASDAQ, it offers strong trading volume and tight bid-ask spreads, supporting efficient execution for both retail and institutional investors.

Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) Overview

The Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) is an actively managed fund seeking current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation through a portfolio of preferred securities issued by U.S. companies. The strategy emphasizes minimizing concentration risk and managing call risks common in preferred markets while using modest leverage to optimize yield-to-call. Holdings are typically more concentrated than broad indexes, with a focus on securities offering attractive risk-adjusted yields. Sector exposure remains heavily weighted toward financial institutions. PFFA carries a higher expense ratio reflective of its active management, generally around 1.40%. The fund rebalances dynamically based on the manager’s assessment of credit quality, call features, and market conditions. Listed on NYSE Arca, PFFA provides solid liquidity suitable for income-focused portfolios seeking tactical adjustments within the preferred securities space.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The preferred securities sector benefits from its hybrid nature, offering equity-like upside potential alongside fixed-income characteristics such as priority in dividends and liquidation. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate expectations, as preferred securities often exhibit negative correlation with rising rates due to their fixed or floating distributions. Capital flows into income products have supported the sector during periods of economic uncertainty, while regulatory developments around bank capital requirements influence issuance from financial institutions, the dominant sector. Risks encompass call provisions that can cap upside in declining rate environments, credit quality fluctuations, and sector concentration in financials. Broader equity market rotations and corporate earnings cycles of key issuers also affect performance dynamics in recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, PFF has delivered steady income through its diversified, passive approach, with performance closely mirroring the underlying preferred index amid interest rate volatility. PFFA’s active management has positioned it for potentially higher yields by avoiding negative yield-to-call securities, though this comes with greater volatility and expense drag. Relative positioning shows PFF benefiting from broader diversification during sector rotations, while PFFA may capture opportunities in specific issuers during earnings cycles. Both ETFs exhibit sensitivity to interest rate shifts and financial sector health, but PFF’s lower costs support more consistent net returns over extended periods. Liquidity profiles favor PFF due to its larger scale and index tracking, enhancing its appeal for core portfolio allocations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor the iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) in the current environment. Its passive index-tracking methodology, significantly lower expense ratio, and broader diversification profile provide stronger cost efficiency and risk mitigation compared to active alternatives. PFF’s alignment with a transparent benchmark and superior liquidity support more consistent positioning amid sector momentum in preferred securities, while maintaining balanced exposure to financial institutions without excessive concentration. This probabilistic assessment prioritizes durability and efficiency for long-term income strategies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PFF vs. PFFA commentary
Sep 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFF is a Hold and PFFA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFF has more net assets: 12.6B vs. PFFA (2.46B). PFFA has a higher annual dividend yield than PFF: PFFA (2.429) vs PFF (-0.380). PFF was incepted earlier than PFFA: PFF (20 years) vs PFFA (8 years). PFF (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than PFFA (2.11). PFFA has a higher turnover PFF (20.00) vs PFF (20.00).
PFFPFFAPFF / PFFA
Gain YTD-0.3802.429-16%
Net Assets12.6B2.46B512%
Total Expense Ratio0.452.1121%
Turnover20.0058.0034%
Yield5.438.5963%
Fund Existence20 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFFPFFA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
PFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFFA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCTW41.910.06
+0.13%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW)
QABA66.87-0.08
-0.11%
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA)
LDUR94.42-0.18
-0.19%
PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR)
WMSB24.61-0.07
-0.27%
Weitz Multisector Bond ETF (WMSB)
PYPU30.21-0.71
-2.31%
Direxion Daily PYPL Bull 2X ETF (PYPU)

PFFA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFFA has been loosely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFFA jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFFA
1D Price
Change %
PFFA100%
+0.15%
HBANP - PFFA
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
BHFAO - PFFA
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
BHFAP - PFFA
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CNOB - PFFA
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SIGIP - PFFA
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More