Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFGAX vs WHOSX
PFGAX vs WHOSX Comparison
Open Charts PFGAX vs WHOSX
PIMCO Long-Term US Government A
Price$14.25
Change-$0.07 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets792.44M
Wasatch-Hoisington US Treasury
Price$10.60
Change-$0.06 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.43M
PFGAX vs WHOSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFGAX vs. WHOSX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFGAX is a Hold and WHOSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFGAX has more cash in the bank: 792M vs. WHOSX (145M). WHOSX pays higher dividends than PFGAX: WHOSX (3.96) vs PFGAX (3.38). PFGAX was incepted earlier than WHOSX: PFGAX (29 years) vs WHOSX (39 years). PFGAX (4.00) is less costly to investors than WHOSX (0.73). PFGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. WHOSX (83.00). PFGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHOSX: PFGAX (1000) vs WHOSX (2000). PFGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.78 vs. WHOSX (-10.18). WHOSX (-46.95) and PFGAX (-48.56) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PFGAX | WHOSX | PFGAX / WHOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.00 | 0.73 | 549% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.00 | 0.73 | 549% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.632 | 4.478 | 148% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 792M | 145M | 546% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.38 | 3.96 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.78 | -10.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.60 | -11.77 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.56 | -46.95 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | -56.82 | -25.76 | 221% |