Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFGKX vs RGACX
PFGKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PFGKX vs RGACX
PFGKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFGKX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFGKX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PFGKX (6.33B). PFGKX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . PFGKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PFGKX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than PFGKX (0.67). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PFGKX (26.00). PFGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PFGKX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. PFGKX (-6.65). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. PFGKX (-1.51).
| PFGKX | RGACX | PFGKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.143 | 6.959 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.33B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.65 | 3.68 | -181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.93 | 37.13 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.51 | 13.46 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.54 | 97.58 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement