Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMEBX
PFPWX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMEBX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$55.65
Change-$0.29 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.36
Change-$0.51 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.13B
PFPWX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PFPWX (4.57B). PFPWX (1.12) and RMEBX (1.12) have matching dividends . PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PFPWX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMEBX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.40 vs. PFPWX (2.27). PFPWX return over 5 years is better than : 62.04 vs. RMEBX (55.97).
| PFPWX | RMEBX | PFPWX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.370 | 8.707 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 109B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.12 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.27 | 8.40 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.81 | 29.27 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.04 | 55.97 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.41 | 73.29 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement