Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFPWX vs RMEBX
PFPWX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PFPWX vs RMEBX
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
Price$56.91
Change+$0.45 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.56B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.95
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.45B
PFPWX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFPWX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFPWX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. PFPWX (4.56B). RMEBX (1.11) and PFPWX (1.09) have matching dividends . PFPWX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PFPWX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PFPWX (0.71). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PFPWX (24.08). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPWX: RMEBX (250) vs PFPWX (100000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.69 vs. PFPWX (7.09). PFPWX return over 5 years is better than : 58.09 vs. RMEBX (53.83).
| PFPWX | RMEBX | PFPWX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.359 | 9.788 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 108B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.11 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.09 | 9.69 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.23 | 25.45 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.09 | 53.83 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.70 | 77.07 | 140% |