PFS
Price
$16.64
Change
-$0.14 (-0.83%)
Updated
May 22, 03:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
64 days until earnings call
PPBI
Price
$21.23
Change
+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Updated
May 22, 03:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.26B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs PPBI

Header iconPFS vs PPBI Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs PPBIBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$16.64
Change-$0.14 (-0.83%)
Volume$650
Capitalization1.1B
Pacific Premier Ban
Price$21.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.26B
PFS vs PPBI Comparison Chart
Loading...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. PPBI commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a Buy and PPBI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (PFS: $16.78 vs. PPBI: $21.22)
Brand notoriety: PFS and PPBI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 80% vs. PPBI: 62%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $1.1B vs. PPBI: $2.26B
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.1B. PPBI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePPBI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PPBI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than PPBI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PPBI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PPBI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PFS and PPBI are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.91% price change this week, while PPBI (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

PPBI is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PPBI($2.26B) has a higher market cap than PFS($1.1B). PPBI has higher P/E ratio than PFS: PPBI (76.03) vs PFS (8.49). PFS YTD gains are higher at: -8.707 vs. PPBI (-12.398). PFS has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. PPBI (147M). PPBI has less debt than PFS: PPBI (932M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than PPBI: PFS (479M) vs PPBI (409M).
PFSPPBIPFS / PPBI
Capitalization1.1B2.26B49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.707-12.39870%
P/E Ratio8.4976.0311%
Revenue479M409M117%
Total Cash189M147M129%
Total Debt1.46B932M157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs PPBI: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
PPBI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6020
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5575
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PPBI's Valuation (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (31) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PPBI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PPBI (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PPBI’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PPBI (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PPBI’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PPBI (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to PPBI’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for PPBI (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew significantly faster than PPBI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSPPBI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLCAX137.95N/A
N/A
Vanguard Large Cap Index Admiral
LRSQX12.20N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
STCEX4.54N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Eq C
FNKFX15.89N/A
N/A
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6
JDINX50.27-0.20
-0.40%
Janus Henderson Overseas N