PFS
Price
$19.69
Change
+$0.21 (+1.08%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
24 days until earnings call
UBSI
Price
$37.19
Change
+$0.46 (+1.25%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.27B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs UBSI

Header iconPFS vs UBSI Comparison
Open Charts PFS vs UBSIBanner chart's image
Provident Financial Services
Price$19.69
Change+$0.21 (+1.08%)
Volume$716.65K
Capitalization2.57B
United Bankshares
Price$37.19
Change+$0.46 (+1.25%)
Volume$701.1K
Capitalization5.27B
PFS vs UBSI Comparison Chart in %
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. UBSI commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a Hold and UBSI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (PFS: $19.69 vs. UBSI: $37.19)
Brand notoriety: PFS and UBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 123% vs. UBSI: 116%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $2.57B vs. UBSI: $5.27B
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.57B. UBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than UBSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UBSI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBSI is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while UBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

UBSI is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSI($5.27B) has a higher market cap than PFS($2.57B). UBSI has higher P/E ratio than PFS: UBSI (12.93) vs PFS (10.47). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 8.476 vs. UBSI (2.153). UBSI has more cash in the bank: 327M vs. PFS (234M). UBSI has less debt than PFS: UBSI (648M) vs PFS (2.68B). UBSI has higher revenues than PFS: UBSI (1.12B) vs PFS (839M).
PFSUBSIPFS / UBSI
Capitalization2.57B5.27B49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.4762.153394%
P/E Ratio10.4712.9381%
Revenue839M1.12B75%
Total Cash234M327M72%
Total Debt2.68B648M413%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs UBSI: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
UBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4541
SMR RATING
1..100
1412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9461
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8542

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (21) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as UBSI (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (14) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as UBSI (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFS (94) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSUBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIIEX45.330.26
+0.58%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R2E
PRESX27.430.15
+0.55%
T. Rowe Price European Stock
BCAIX37.760.20
+0.53%
Boston Common ESG Impact Intl
TIRHX18.280.06
+0.33%
Nuveen Real Estate Sec Sel I
LOFLX15.380.04
+0.26%
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3