Ad is loading...
PFSAX vs RPFGX
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts PFSAX vs RPFGX
PGIM Jennison Financial Services A
Price$23.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.3M
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSAX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. PFSAX (161M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than PFSAX: RPFGX (1.51) vs PFSAX (0.40). PFSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: PFSAX (26 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). PFSAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.95). PFSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). PFSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). PFSAX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.55 vs. PFSAX (12.15). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 113.39 vs. PFSAX (87.78).
| PFSAX | RPFGX | PFSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.95 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.95 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.522 | 5.043 | 10% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 116% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 1.02B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.51 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.15 | 18.55 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.30 | 46.69 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.78 | 113.39 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.73 | 81.75 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...