Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSAX vs RPFGX
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts PFSAX vs RPFGX
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSAX is a StrongBuy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. PFSAX (160M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than PFSAX: RPFGX (1.24) vs PFSAX (0.58). PFSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: PFSAX (27 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). PFSAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). PFSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RPFGX (10.00). PFSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). PFSAX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.42 vs. PFSAX (2.82). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.82 vs. PFSAX (14.61).
| PFSAX | RPFGX | PFSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.884 | 4.914 | 201% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 116% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 1.2B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.24 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.82 | 11.42 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.51 | 81.11 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.61 | 55.82 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.66 | 129.53 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement