Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PFSAX vs RPFGX
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts PFSAX vs RPFGX
PFSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PFSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSAX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. PFSAX (148M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than PFSAX: RPFGX (1.37) vs PFSAX (0.65). PFSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: PFSAX (27 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). PFSAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). PFSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RPFGX (10.00). PFSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). PFSAX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. PFSAX (-2.57). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.33 vs. PFSAX (9.93).
| PFSAX | RPFGX | PFSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.471 | -0.126 | -374% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 116% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 1.15B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.37 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.57 | 11.38 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.54 | 76.18 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.93 | 51.33 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.11 | 139.71 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement