Advertisement
PFSMF vs TRPCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFSMF is a Buy and TRPCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PFSMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTRPCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PFSMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- TRPCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TRPCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TRPCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PFSMF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRPCF (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -1.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.42%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.76%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (+1.81% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
@Consumer Sundries (+2.67% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
| PFSMF | TRPCF | PFSMF / TRPCF | |
| Capitalization | 254M | 40.7B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 542M | 19.4B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | -11.009 | 17.058 | -65% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.96 | 18.23 | 71% |
| Revenue | 1.3B | 55.2B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 471M | 78.1B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 239M | 42.8B | 1% |
| TRPCF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 17% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 21% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 26% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% |
Advertisement
PFSMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PFSMF and NTRP have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFSMF and NTRP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFSMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTRP - PFSMF | 5% Poorly correlated | -7.79% | ||
| EM - PFSMF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| EJH - PFSMF | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.62% | ||
| SDRMF - PFSMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRPCF - PFSMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TRPCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TRPCF and ROL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRPCF and ROL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRPCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRPCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ROL - TRPCF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| WW - TRPCF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| ABNB - TRPCF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| EM - TRPCF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| MRM - TRPCF | 4% Poorly correlated | -6.19% | ||
More | ||||