PG
Price
$146.97
Change
-$0.02 (-0.01%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
343.48B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$58.87
Change
-$0.52 (-0.88%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
144.12B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PG vs UL

Header iconPG vs UL Comparison
Open Charts PG vs ULBanner chart's image
Procter & Gamble
Price$146.97
Change-$0.02 (-0.01%)
Volume$42.13K
Capitalization343.48B
Unilever
Price$58.87
Change-$0.52 (-0.88%)
Volume$17.48K
Capitalization144.12B
PG vs UL Comparison Chart in %
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PG vs. UL commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PG is a Hold and UL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (PG: $146.99 vs. UL: $58.87)
Brand notoriety: PG: Notable vs. UL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PG: 80% vs. UL: 74%
Market capitalization -- PG: $343.48B vs. UL: $144.12B
PG [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $343.48B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $144.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $343.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PG and UL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the short-term than UL.

Price Growth

PG (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.69% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -3.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2503.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

PG is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

UL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-2.77% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($343B) has a higher market cap than UL($144B). UL has higher P/E ratio than PG: UL (22.70) vs PG (21.46). UL YTD gains are higher at: 7.411 vs. PG (-10.007). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.8B vs. UL (11.3B). PG has higher revenues than UL: PG (84.9B) vs UL (59.8B).
PGULPG / UL
Capitalization343B144B238%
EBITDA24.8B11.3B219%
Gain YTD-10.0077.411-135%
P/E Ratio21.4622.7095%
Revenue84.9B59.8B142%
Total Cash11.2BN/A-
Total Debt35.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PG vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
PG
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6664
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5962
SMR RATING
1..100
3096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7730
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UL's Valuation (27) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (43). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (62). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's SMR Rating (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for UL (96). This means that PG’s stock grew significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (61). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

UL's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (77). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHX26.150.09
+0.35%
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF™
UJAN42.310.07
+0.17%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buff ETF™ Jan
MYCJ24.97-0.01
-0.04%
SPDR SSGA My2030 Corporate Bond ETF
BBCB45.87-0.03
-0.07%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF
JHMD39.67-0.11
-0.28%
JHancock Multifactor Developed Intl ETF