Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGBHX vs RGAGX
PGBHX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PGBHX vs RGAGX
PGBHX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGBHX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGBHX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PGBHX (6.6B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PGBHX: RGAGX (0.51) vs PGBHX (0.00). PGBHX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PGBHX (10 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). PGBHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGBHX (20.90). PGBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: PGBHX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. PGBHX (-19.80). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. PGBHX (-3.88).
| PGBHX | RGAGX | PGBHX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.29 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.29 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.117 | 9.321 | -12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.6B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.80 | 0.49 | -4,048% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.12 | 44.65 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.88 | 15.00 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers