Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGFIX vs RGACX
PGFIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PGFIX vs RGACX
PGFIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGFIX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGFIX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PGFIX (1.9B). PGFIX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGFIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PGFIX (27 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than PGFIX (0.71). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGFIX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGFIX: RGACX (250) vs PGFIX (1000000). PGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.52 vs. RGACX (0.93). PGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 18.16 vs. RGACX (10.91).
| PGFIX | RGACX | PGFIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.93 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.358 | 5.397 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.52 | 0.93 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.66 | 33.65 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.16 | 10.91 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.15 | 94.42 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement