Ad is loading...
PGIRX vs RNPFX
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGIRX vs RNPFX
Polen Global Growth Investor
Price$23.67
Change+$0.47 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.54M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$59.92
Change+$0.93 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.87B
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGIRX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGIRX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. PGIRX (330M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGIRX: RNPFX (0.84) vs PGIRX (0.00). PGIRX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGIRX (10 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGIRX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGIRX (21.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGIRX: RNPFX (250) vs PGIRX (3000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.97 vs. PGIRX (-6.53). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.99 vs. PGIRX (30.34).
| PGIRX | RNPFX | PGIRX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.251 | -4.916 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.53 | 0.97 | -670% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.26 | 8.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.34 | 43.99 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.09 | - |