Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGIRX vs RNPFX
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGIRX vs RNPFX
Polen Global Growth Investor
Price$27.25
Change-$0.23 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.55M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$73.08
Change-$0.06 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.12B
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGIRX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGIRX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. PGIRX (348M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGIRX: RNPFX (0.72) vs PGIRX (0.00). PGIRX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGIRX (10 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGIRX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). PGIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGIRX: RNPFX (250) vs PGIRX (3000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. PGIRX (4.57). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.43 vs. PGIRX (26.39).
| PGIRX | RNPFX | PGIRX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.416 | 17.795 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 348M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 15.38 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.61 | 49.67 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.39 | 41.43 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.19 | 102.63 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement