Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGIRX vs RNPFX
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGIRX vs RNPFX
Polen Global Growth Investor
Price$27.09
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.24M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$73.89
Change+$0.40 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.01B
PGIRX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGIRX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGIRX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. PGIRX (319M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGIRX: RNPFX (0.70) vs PGIRX (0.00). PGIRX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGIRX (10 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGIRX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). PGIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGIRX: RNPFX (250) vs PGIRX (3000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. PGIRX (2.89). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.21 vs. PGIRX (20.20).
| PGIRX | RNPFX | PGIRX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.46 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.46 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.758 | 19.101 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.89 | 13.49 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.62 | 68.36 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.20 | 36.21 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.51 | 99.90 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement