PGNT vs RXLSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGNT is a Hold and RXLSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PGNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRXLSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PGNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RXLSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
PGNT (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а +14.86% price change this week, while RXLSF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was -4.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
PGNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics Distributors (-1.72% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
| PGNT | RXLSF | PGNT / RXLSF | |
| Capitalization | 4.42M | 7.26B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.67B | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.556 | 17.391 | -32% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.21 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 19.4B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 762M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 3.89B | - |
PGNT | RXLSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RXLSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGNT (48). This means that RXLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGNT’s over the last 12 months.
RXLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PGNT (35). This means that RXLSF’s stock grew similarly to PGNT’s over the last 12 months.
PGNT's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RXLSF (92). This means that PGNT’s stock grew significantly faster than RXLSF’s over the last 12 months.
PGNT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as RXLSF (49). This means that PGNT’s stock grew similarly to RXLSF’s over the last 12 months.
RXLSF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PGNT (75). This means that RXLSF’s stock grew similarly to PGNT’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LICFX | 15.03 | -0.13 | -0.86% |
| Lord Abbett International Equity F | |||
| LGMCX | 25.04 | -0.26 | -1.03% |
| Loomis Sayles Global Allocation C | |||
| FARLX | 12.93 | -0.15 | -1.15% |
| FS Chiron Real Development A | |||
| ESIFX | 12.27 | -0.17 | -1.37% |
| Eaton Vance Balanced R6 | |||
| VISGX | 78.83 | -1.25 | -1.56% |
| Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Inv | |||
PGNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGNT and SPRS have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGNT and SPRS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGNT | 100% | +2.41% | ||
| SPRS - PGNT | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| RXLSF - PGNT | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SKSJF - PGNT | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EACO - PGNT | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RXEEY - PGNT | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||
RXLSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RXLSF and RXEEY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RXLSF and RXEEY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RXLSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RXLSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RXEEY - RXLSF | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| ARW - RXLSF | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| PGNT - RXLSF | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.41% | ||
| NSIT - RXLSF | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
| AVT - RXLSF | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||