Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBAX
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBAX
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PGPCX (2.39B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBAX (1.14) vs PGPCX (0.66). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PGPCX (27 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). PGPCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.22 vs. PGPCX (11.14). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.98 vs. PGPCX (22.93).
| PGPCX | RLBAX | PGPCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.677 | 9.447 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.14 | 16.22 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.94 | 40.25 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.93 | 31.98 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.66 | 79.50 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement