Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBAX
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBAX
PGPCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PGPCX (2.45B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBAX (1.13) vs PGPCX (0.77). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PGPCX (27 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). PGPCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.83 vs. PGPCX (8.37). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.51 vs. PGPCX (21.02).
| PGPCX | RLBAX | PGPCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.32 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.152 | 9.663 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.13 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.37 | 11.83 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.59 | 39.69 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.02 | 29.51 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.07 | 74.31 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers