PGPHF
Price
$1328.48
Change
-$78.11 (-5.55%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
29.13B
PIAC
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 20 closing price
Capitalization
31.33M
Ad is loading...

PGPHF vs PIAC

Header iconPGPHF vs PIAC Comparison
Open Charts PGPHF vs PIACBanner chart's image
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
Price$1328.48
Change-$78.11 (-5.55%)
Volume$19
Capitalization29.13B
Princeton Capital
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization31.33M
PGPHF vs PIAC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PGPHF vs. PIAC commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPHF is a Hold and PIAC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (PGPHF: $1328.48 vs. PIAC: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: PGPHF and PIAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PGPHF: 33% vs. PIAC: 327%
Market capitalization -- PGPHF: $29.13B vs. PIAC: $31.33M
PGPHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $29.13B. PIAC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $31.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PGPHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PGPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIAC is a better buy in the long-term than PGPHF.

Price Growth

PGPHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -10.52% price change this week, while PIAC (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGPHF($29.1B) has a higher market cap than PIAC($31.3M). PGPHF has higher P/E ratio than PIAC: PGPHF (25.71) vs PIAC (4.64). PGPHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.243 vs. PIAC (-14.408). PGPHF has more cash in the bank: 307M vs. PIAC (311K). PIAC has less debt than PGPHF: PIAC (26.8K) vs PGPHF (1.13B). PGPHF has higher revenues than PIAC: PGPHF (2.33B) vs PIAC (8.58M).
PGPHFPIACPGPHF / PIAC
Capitalization29.1B31.3M92,971%
EBITDA1.57BN/A-
Gain YTD0.243-14.408-2%
P/E Ratio25.714.64554%
Revenue2.33B8.58M27,196%
Total Cash307M311K98,714%
Total Debt1.13B26.8K4,220,149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGPHF vs PIAC: Fundamental Ratings
PGPHF
PIAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2631
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
2497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5787
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5245
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIAC's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGPHF (89). This means that PIAC’s stock grew significantly faster than PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

PGPHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIAC (100). This means that PGPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIAC’s over the last 12 months.

PGPHF's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PIAC (97). This means that PGPHF’s stock grew significantly faster than PIAC’s over the last 12 months.

PGPHF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as PIAC (87). This means that PGPHF’s stock grew similarly to PIAC’s over the last 12 months.

PIAC's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as PGPHF (52). This means that PIAC’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWTR29.35N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI Water Mgmt Mltsctr ETF
AGNG30.68-0.28
-0.90%
Global X Aging Population ETF
NUDM31.23-0.75
-2.35%
Nuveen ESG Intl Dev Mkts Eq ETF
CWS64.39-1.90
-2.87%
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
IFRA44.02-1.85
-4.03%
iShares US Infrastructure ETF

PGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPHF and BRDG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPHF and BRDG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGPHF
1D Price
Change %
PGPHF100%
-5.55%
BRDG - PGPHF
31%
Poorly correlated
-11.82%
BLK - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.71%
BN - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
BAM - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.38%
IVZ - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
-11.85%
More

PIAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIAC and EQBBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIAC and EQBBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIAC
1D Price
Change %
PIAC100%
N/A
EQBBF - PIAC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - PIAC
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
QUILF - PIAC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNGPF - PIAC
-2%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
PGPHF - PIAC
-2%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%
More