Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPAX
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPAX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$56.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$67.20
Change+$0.10 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGRCX (1.04B). PGRCX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). RNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPAX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.84 vs. PGRCX (-4.47). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.89 vs. PGRCX (11.20).
| PGRCX | RNPAX | PGRCX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.49 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.49 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.405 | 17.833 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.47 | 13.84 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.44 | 48.42 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.20 | 32.89 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.59 | 91.57 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement