Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPAX
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPAX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$53.11
Change-$0.06 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$61.54
Change-$0.23 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. PGRCX (1.01B). PGRCX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: PGRCX (0.02) vs RNPAX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). RNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPAX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. PGRCX (-9.65). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.30 vs. PGRCX (13.02).
| PGRCX | RNPAX | PGRCX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.49 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.49 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.605 | 8.311 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 150B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.65 | 8.03 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.94 | 26.25 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.02 | 37.30 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.03 | 67.71 | 12% |