Ad is loading...
PGRCX vs RNPAX
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPAX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$47.05
Change-$1.40 (-2.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets975.7M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$52.58
Change-$1.16 (-2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.16B
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Hold and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. PGRCX (976M). PGRCX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: PGRCX (0.02) vs RNPAX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). RNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPAX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.87 vs. PGRCX (-14.84). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.98 vs. PGRCX (18.19).
| PGRCX | RNPAX | PGRCX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.49 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.49 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.592 | -5.769 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 976M | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.84 | -2.87 | 516% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.44 | 1.00 | -1,240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.19 | 39.98 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.27 | 45.05 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...