Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPAX
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPAX
PGRCX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. PGRCX (938M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPAX (0.36) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: PGRCX (31 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). PGRCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). RNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PGRCX (11.23). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPAX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. PGRCX (-8.19). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.84 vs. PGRCX (-20.13).
| PGRCX | RNPAX | PGRCX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.49 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.49 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.993 | 6.908 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 938M | 164B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.19 | 12.54 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.31 | 39.50 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.13 | 13.84 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.20 | 101.68 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement