Ad is loading...
PGRCX vs RNPEX
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPEX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$47.05
Change-$1.40 (-2.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets975.7M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$56.27
Change-$1.24 (-2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.16B
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. PGRCX (976M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPEX (0.56) vs PGRCX (0.02). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). RNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPEX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.86 vs. PGRCX (-14.84). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 45.92 vs. PGRCX (18.19).
| PGRCX | RNPEX | PGRCX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.76 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.76 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.592 | -5.582 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 976M | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.56 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.84 | -1.86 | 796% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.44 | 3.29 | -378% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.19 | 45.92 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.27 | 52.78 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...