Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPEX
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPEX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$53.11
Change-$0.06 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$65.93
Change-$0.25 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.71B
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. PGRCX (1.01B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPEX (0.51) vs PGRCX (0.02). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). RNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPEX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. PGRCX (-9.65). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.11 vs. PGRCX (13.02).
| PGRCX | RNPEX | PGRCX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.76 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.76 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.605 | 8.652 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 151B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.51 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.65 | 9.15 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.94 | 29.10 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.02 | 43.11 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.03 | 76.64 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement