Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPEX
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPEX
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. PGRCX (938M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPEX (0.93) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: PGRCX (31 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). PGRCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). RNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PGRCX (11.23). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPEX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.82 vs. PGRCX (-8.19). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 19.04 vs. PGRCX (-20.13).
| PGRCX | RNPEX | PGRCX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.75 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.75 | 255% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.993 | 7.230 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 938M | 164B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.19 | 13.82 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.31 | 43.99 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.13 | 19.04 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.20 | 114.29 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement