Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPEX
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPEX
PGRCX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. PGRCX (887M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPEX (0.93) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: PGRCX (31 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). PGRCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). RNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PGRCX (11.23). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPEX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. PGRCX (-13.54). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 12.50 vs. PGRCX (-25.83).
| PGRCX | RNPEX | PGRCX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.75 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.75 | 255% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.730 | 4.482 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 887M | 172B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.54 | 8.58 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.91 | 38.88 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.83 | 12.50 | -207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.45 | 118.83 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers