Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$55.02
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$69.93
Change-$0.42 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.59B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. PGRCX (1.04B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (0.74) vs PGRCX (0.02). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.97 vs. PGRCX (-7.87). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.12 vs. PGRCX (13.80).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.814 | 12.718 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 157B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.74 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.87 | 9.97 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.38 | 47.91 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.80 | 42.12 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.43 | 83.25 | 14% |