Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$57.18
Change-$0.31 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.17
Change-$0.42 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. PGRCX (1.05B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (0.70) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.23 vs. PGRCX (-2.77). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.75 vs. PGRCX (10.81).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.419 | 19.552 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 164B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.77 | 14.23 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.07 | 64.59 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.81 | 37.75 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.35 | 102.37 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement