Ad is loading...
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$53.14
Change-$0.61 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$64.92
Change-$0.80 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.51B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. PGRCX (1.09B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (1.07) vs PGRCX (0.11). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PGRCX (8.87). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.73 vs. PGRCX (-7.49). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. PGRCX (12.04).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.546 | 4.642 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 148B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.07 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.49 | 10.73 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.51 | 15.15 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.04 | 35.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.25 | 74.81 | 8% |