Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$54.40
Change+$0.80 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets998.77M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$70.56
Change+$1.23 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.03B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. PGRCX (999M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (0.74) vs PGRCX (0.02). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.47 vs. PGRCX (-6.15). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.27 vs. PGRCX (7.43).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.443 | 13.733 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 999M | 154B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.74 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.15 | 17.47 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.92 | 37.26 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.43 | 38.27 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.03 | 86.13 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement