Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$53.11
Change-$0.06 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$67.24
Change-$0.25 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. PGRCX (1.01B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (0.77) vs PGRCX (0.02). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. PGRCX (-9.65). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.97 vs. PGRCX (13.02).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.605 | 8.785 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 150B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.77 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.65 | 9.55 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.94 | 30.09 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.02 | 44.97 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.03 | 79.50 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement