Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$56.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$73.64
Change+$0.11 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGRCX (1.04B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (0.72) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. PGRCX (-4.47). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.29 vs. PGRCX (11.20).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.405 | 18.698 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.47 | 15.45 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.44 | 52.96 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.20 | 40.29 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.59 | 105.01 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement