Ad is loading...
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$47.05
Change-$1.40 (-2.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets975.7M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$57.36
Change-$1.26 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.16B
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. PGRCX (976M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (0.84) vs PGRCX (0.02). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (30 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.50 vs. PGRCX (-14.84). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.79 vs. PGRCX (18.19).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.46 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.592 | -5.513 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 976M | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.84 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.84 | -1.50 | 990% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.44 | 4.09 | -304% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.19 | 47.79 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.27 | 55.23 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...