Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PGRCX vs RNPFX
PGRCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGRCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGRCX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. PGRCX (887M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: RNPFX (1.18) vs PGRCX (0.00). PGRCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PGRCX (31 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). PGRCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PGRCX (11.23). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: RNPFX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. PGRCX (-13.54). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.28 vs. PGRCX (-25.83).
| PGRCX | RNPFX | PGRCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.45 | 424% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.45 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.730 | 4.621 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 887M | 172B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.54 | 9.02 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.91 | 40.49 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.83 | 14.28 | -181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.45 | 123.13 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement