Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGROX vs RNPAX
PGROX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts PGROX vs RNPAX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth A
Price$71.43
Change-$0.26 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$65.68
Change+$0.31 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.47B
PGROX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGROX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGROX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. PGROX (1.02B). PGROX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: PGROX (0.14) vs RNPAX (0.00). PGROX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: PGROX (32 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PGROX (1.12). RNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGROX (13.83). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGROX: RNPAX (250) vs PGROX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. PGROX (-1.58). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.37 vs. PGROX (18.46).
| PGROX | RNPAX | PGROX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.49 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.49 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.781 | 15.167 | 58% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.58 | 13.89 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 45.16 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | 29.37 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.32 | 87.34 | 53% |