Ad is loading...
PGROX vs RNPAX
PGROX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts PGROX vs RNPAX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth A
Price$64.18
Change+$0.33 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$56.46
Change+$0.33 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.47B
PGROX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGROX vs. RNPAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGROX is a StrongBuy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. PGROX (1.01B). PGROX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: PGROX (0.26) vs RNPAX (0.00). PGROX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: PGROX (32 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PGROX (1.12). RNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGROX (13.83). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGROX: RNPAX (250) vs PGROX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.73 vs. PGROX (-10.17). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.59 vs. PGROX (46.30).
| PGROX | RNPAX | PGROX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.49 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.49 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.890 | -0.999 | 289% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 137B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.17 | 1.73 | -588% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.83 | 1.38 | -496% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.30 | 61.59 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.67 | 54.89 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...