Ad is loading...
PGWCX vs RGABX
PGWCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGABX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$26.32
Change-$1.66 (-5.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$56.09
Change-$3.45 (-5.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.01B
PGWCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGABX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. PGWCX (1.28B). PGWCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: PGWCX (41 years) vs RGABX (23 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGABX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.42 vs. PGWCX (-2.78). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 61.44 vs. PGWCX (16.75).
| PGWCX | RGABX | PGWCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.39 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.39 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.305 | -5.014 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 264B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.78 | -1.42 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.87 | 1.35 | -64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.75 | 61.44 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.50 | 47.58 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...