Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGABX
PGWCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGABX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$37.57
Change+$0.26 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.35
Change+$0.55 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
PGWCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PGWCX (1.76B). PGWCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGABX (23 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGABX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. PGWCX (10.91). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 37.38 vs. PGWCX (-6.89).
| PGWCX | RGABX | PGWCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.39 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.39 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.190 | 17.133 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.91 | 15.02 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.43 | 56.10 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.89 | 37.38 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.71 | 86.79 | 24% |