Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGABX
PGWCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGABX
PGWCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Hold and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PGWCX (1.88B). PGWCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: PGWCX (43 years) vs RGABX (24 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.38). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGWCX (20.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGABX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.94 vs. PGWCX (-9.69). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.33 vs. PGWCX (-27.01).
| PGWCX | RGABX | PGWCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.38 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.38 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.502 | 8.489 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.69 | -1.94 | 500% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.39 | 35.88 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.01 | 5.33 | -506% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.81 | 86.62 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers