Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGACX
PGWCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGACX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$38.36
Change+$0.20 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
PGWCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PGWCX (1.81B). RGACX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: RGACX (0.07) vs PGWCX (0.00). PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGACX (23 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGACX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. PGWCX (10.03). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.04 vs. PGWCX (-8.99).
| PGWCX | RGACX | PGWCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.94 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.94 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.814 | 19.586 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 14.19 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.50 | 74.27 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.99 | 40.04 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.50 | 101.32 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement